S.Korea to scrap intelligence-sharing pact with Japan amid row over history

* S.Korea, Japan in worsening political, economic dispute

* Seoul says intelligence agreement no longer in national interest

* Japan protests decision to end arrangement

* Pact was aimed at countering N.Korea nuclear, missile threats (Recasts with Japanese foreign minister)

By Hyonhee Shin, Josh Smith and Kiyoshi Takenaka

SEOUL/TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) - South Korea said on Thursday it will scrap an intelligence-sharing pact with Japan, drawing a swift protest from Tokyo and deepening a decades-old row over history that has hit trade and undercut security cooperation over North Korea.

Seoul's decision not to extend the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) shows how the political and trade dispute between the Asian neighbours and U.S. allies has now hit some of the region's most sensitive security issues. The agreement had been due for automatic renewal on Saturday.

The arrangement was designed to share information on the threat posed by North Korea and its missile and nuclear activities - a threat underlined by the North's recent launch of a series of short-range ballistic missiles.

Explaining its decision, South Korea's Kim You-geun, a deputy director of the presidential National Security Council (NSC), said Japan had created a "grave change" in the environment for bilateral security cooperation by removing South Korea's fast-track export status this month.

"Under this situation, we have determined that it would not serve our national interest to maintain an agreement we signed with the aim of exchanging military information which is sensitive to security," Kim told a news conference.

Relations between the northeast Asian neighbours began to deteriorate late last year following a diplomatic row over compensation for wartime forced labourers during Japan's occupation of Korea.

They soured further when Japan tightened its curbs on exports of high-tech materials needed by South Korea's chip industry and again this month when Tokyo said it would remove South Korea's fast-track export status.

Japan's foreign minister, Taro Kono, criticised Seoul for what he said was mixing the export controls with security issues.

"Given such issues as North Korea, everyone probably understands the importance of this agreement. But this decision was made while linking it to Japan's review of export controls," he told reporters.

"I cannot help saying they are completely misreading the security environment."

He said Tokyo had summoned the South Korean ambassador in protest.


The South Korean decision is likely to be met with dismay in the United States, which fears weakened security cooperation.

South Korea's won currency extended losses against the dollar in offshore non-deliverable forward trade, falling by some 0.4% against the dollar in five minutes after the announcement on concern that trade disputes with Japan could be drawn out.

Intelligence sharing is key to developing a common defence policy and strategy, and all three countries are safer when they work together, Pentagon spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Dave Eastburn said.

South Korea's foreign minister, Kang Kyung-wha, emphasised that the decision to end the intelligence pact was because South Korea had lost trust in Japan.

"We will continue to strengthen cooperation with the United States and develop the alliance," she told reporters in Seoul.

South Korea's defence ministry said that regardless of the end of GSOMIA, it would maintain a "stable" joint defence posture based on a robust alliance with the United States.

One Western military source said the intelligence-sharing was sometimes limited but nevertheless an important area of cooperation in the face of threats from North Korea.

GSOMIA facilitated the sharing of information on North Korea’s nuclear and missile threats, which remain despite a series of summits and negotiations with North Korea, said Cho Tae-yong, a former South Korean national security adviser who worked on the deal when it was first signed.

"Ending GSOMIA is not only the wrong card to play to press Japan, but it is just not helpful for our security," he said.

The decision also comes as China and Russia have been more assertive in the region, flying their first joint military air patrol together in July, which triggered an international incident with South Korea and Japan.


Before the signing of the agreement in 2016, under U.S. pressure, South Korea and Japan shared intelligence through the United States.

South Korea went ahead with the deal at the time despite opposition from some political parties and a large section of the public, who remain bitter over Japan’s actions during its colonial rule of Korea from 1910 until the end of World War Two.

A 2012 attempt to seal the deal fell apart in the face of opposition in South Korea toward military cooperation with Japan.

Relations between the two U.S. allies now appear to be at their lowest since they normalised ties in 1965, plagued by bitterness over Japan's occupation, which included the use of South Korean forced labour at some Japanese firms.

South Korea had warned it could reconsider the GSOMIA after Japan imposed export curbs and then stripped South Korea of its favoured trading partner status.

Seoul said those moves by Japan were in retaliation for a South Korean Supreme Court order for Japanese companies to compensate some of their wartime forced labourers last October.

Japan condemned that ruling, saying the matter was resolved by a 1965 treaty normalising ties. It has also cited unspecified security reasons for its export controls. (Reporting by Hyonhee Shin and Josh Smith; Additional reporting by Tim Kelly, Kiyoshi Takenaka, and Sam Nussey in TOKYO, and Idrees Ali in WASHINGTON; Editing by Robert Birsel, David Dolan and Hugh Lawson)

First Published: 2019-08-22 11:29:04
Updated 2019-08-22 16:50:03

© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Thomson Reuters or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. "Reuters" and the Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.