To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

ORION MINERALS LIMITED - Compelling Extensional and Near-Mine Targets Identified by Airborne and Down-Hole EM Surveys at Prieska

Release Date: 25/02/2019 07:34
Code(s): ORN     PDF:  
Wrap Text
Compelling Extensional and Near-Mine Targets Identified by Airborne and Down-Hole EM Surveys at Prieska

Orion Minerals Limited
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Australia
Australian Company Number 098 939 274
ASX share code: ORN
JSE share code: ORN
ISIN: AU000000ORN1
(“Orion” or “the Company”)

COMPELLING EXTENSIONAL AND NEAR-MINE TARGETS IDENTIFIED BY AIRBORNE AND DOWN-HOLE EM SURVEYS AT PRIESKA


-  Final results received from highly successful 148km2 high-power Airborne Electromagnetic (AEM) survey
   completed over the Prieska Zinc-Copper Project, South Africa.
-  Multiple discrete anomalies identified in the dataset.
-  AEM anomalies detected over known Zn-Cu Volcanic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposits and Ni-Cu intrusive
   occurrences.
-  A number of combined electromagnetic/magnetic anomalies represent compelling follow-up drilling
   targets.
-  Down-hole Time Domain Electromagnetic (DHTDEM) results confirm priority target areas for extensions
   of the Deep Sulphides on the south-eastern limit of the drilled extent of the Prieska Zn-Cu deposit.
-  DHTDEM results support the Company’s geological model for mineralisation to continue well beyond
   Orion’s drill hole intersections in the south-east portion of the Deep Sulphide Resource.

“Figures" and “tables” referred to throughout this announcement can be viewed on the pdf version of the
announcement, available on the Company's website, www.orionminerals.com.au.

Orion’s Managing Director and CEO, Errol Smart, commented:

"These are significant results as they show we are well and truly on track to unlock the broader potential of the
Prieska Project. VMS deposits generally occur in clusters in close proximity to one large or giant deposit, and often
comprise two or three medium-sized deposits and five or six smaller deposits. Despite Prieska being one of the
single largest volcanogenic massive sulphide exhalite bodies known in the world, the area around the deposit
has had virtually no exploration in over 36 years. Now, with the application of advanced, modern geophysics
and the latest geological thinking, we can vector into targets which offer outstanding opportunities for new VMS
discoveries.

We now have an impressive pipeline of near-mine exploration opportunities which we intend to pursue in parallel
with our development strategy, which is based on the recently released Scoping Study and upcoming Bankable
Feasibility Study. It’s rare for a junior like Orion to have both a minimum 10-year production and cash-flow project,
supported by an updated Mineral Resource of 30.5Mt @ 3.7% Zn and 1.2% Cu (reported in accordance with
JORC (2012)), and a multitude of exploration targets with strong potential to grow our production profile and
mine life.

The recognition of additional geophysical targets associated with known nickel-copper sulphide mineralisation
in close proximity to the proposed Prieska Mine operations, is also encouraging and supports our modelling of
the Areachap Belt as a close analogue to the Fraser Range Belt in Western Australia – with the potential for
multiple base metal deposits.”

Orion Minerals Limited (ASX/JSE: ORN) (Orion or Company) is pleased to advise that it has identified numerous
compelling targets for both VMS style zinc-copper mineralisation and nickel-copper sulphide mineralisation within
a 15km radius of the world-class Prieska VMS deposit, as a result of highly successful geophysical surveys over its
flagship Prieska Zinc-Copper Project in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa.
As part of the Company’s Near-Mine Exploration Program, a helicopter-borne magnetic and Electromagnetic
survey (AEM or SkyTEMTM) was completed over the Repli, Vardocube and Bartotrax prospecting rights, which
form part of the Prieska Zinc-Copper Project, in December 2018 (refer ASX release16 January 2019). In addition,

Orion has now received final models for Down-hole Time Domain Electromagnetic (DHTDEM) surveys targeting
possible extensions of the Deep Sulphide Mineral Resource, from its Perth-based consultants, Southern
Geoscience Consultants.

Both surveys have been successful in identifying strong targets for follow-up exploration and drilling.

SkyTEMTM Survey

The SkyTEMTM survey covered an area of 146.78km2 over the Repli, Vardocube and Bartotrax prospecting rights
(see Figure 1 below (Near-Mine Prospecitng Rights)). The survey was flown with the highly innovative SkyTEM TM
312 high-power technology for deep target imaging. This high-power system, with a peak moment up to
1,000,000 NIA, is optimised to provide an exceptional depth of investigation, due to the high moment mode with
high current and low base frequency of 12.5 Hz. High-resolution magnetic data was also recorded.

Figure 1: Locality plan showing the Near-Mine prospecting right area covered by the SkyTEMTM survey.

Several AEM anomalies have been identified from the data by Orion’s Perth-based geophysical consultants,
Southern Geoscience Consultants (see Figure 2).

Due to the high level of “noise” from the Prieska Mine infrastructure, tailings dam, pipelines, Eskom sub-station,
solar power plant and power lines, the data required extensive processing to mask the cultural feature noise in
order to detect the subtle geological source conductors being targeted.

The primary VMS target mineralisation comprises pyrite, with minor pyhrrotite, sphalerite and chalcopyrite and is
unlikely to yield strongly conductive bodies. Integrated analysis of the newly obtained aero-magnetic, AEM and
geological data is therefore essential to generate priority drill targets.

VMS deposits tend to occur in clusters in the vicinity of a large deposit. A cluster will typically consist of one very
large or giant deposit, two to three medium sized deposits and five to six smaller deposits.

During the exploration boom in the 1970s and early 1980s that followed the discovery of the Prieska VMS deposit
in 1968, four VMS deposits and two nickel-copper occurrences were discovered within the Prieska VMS camp
(Figure 2).

Figure 2: Airborne EM anomalies shown on the AEM Channel 30 map on the left and on the aeromagnetic map on the right. Hot colours
represent high conductivity and high susceptibility. The large, linear conductors south and east of the Prieska Zn-Cu Project are caused by
infrastructure.

In recent decades, the geological understanding of VMS mineralisation and improved geophysical and
geochemical techniques have led to numerous discoveries worldwide of clusters of massive sulphides in “camps”
surrounding known major deposits.

The near-mine area at the Prieska Project was not covered during the past 36 years or “modern era” of
exploration. Orion now has the advantage of applying the improved geological understanding of VMS deposits,
combined with modern geophysical exploration tools to target similar discoveries.

In addition, Magmatic Ni-Cu-Co deposits are now known to intrude along plate margins. These intrusions are
therefore commonly emplaced in pre-existing back-arc, valocano sedimenetary stratigraphy that hosts VMS
deposits. As a result, these different styles of mineralisation are commonly found alongside each other in the
meta volcano-sedimentary belts like the Fraser Range in Australia and in the Areachap Belt which hosts the
Prieska VMS deposit. Importantly, the two different massive sulphide base metal deposit styles are detected by
the same geophysical techniques.

Numerous AEM anomalies were identified for follow-up by Southern Geoscience Consultants (Figure 2).

Conductors were detected over known VMS deposits at PK1, PK3 and Annex, as well as at the PK7 and “Ni
Gossan” Ni-Cu occurrences, proving AEM to be effective in detecting sulphides in the surveyed area (Figure 2).

Based on the known mineral occurrences and aero-magnetic interpretation, the AEM anomalies are classified
as VMS or Magmatic Ni-Cu targets. The Ni-Cu occurrences and targets occur along a north to north-northwest
trending structure visible on the newly acquired magnetic data (Figure 2).

Anglovaal reported that percussion scout hole drilling conducted in the 1970s identified nickel-copper
mineralisation associated with sulphides at two localities, PK7 and “Ni Gossan”, which coincide with the
geophysical target. The VMS targets are located on a key stratigraphic horizon that marks a paleo-seafloor and
were also tested by historic scout drilling with positive indications of mineralisation.

Moving forward with the exploration program, Orion plans to rank and prioritise the AEM anomalies with the
integrated use of existing geological data, supported by detailed field mapping and geochemistry to confirm
the geological setting. Fieldwork will take into account the characteristics of VMS deposits including spatial
association with the paleo-seafloor, footwall alteration, and structural setting. Orion plans to follow up selected
anomalies with high-powered ground EM before testing by diamond drilling.

Down-hole Time Domain Electromagnetic (DHTDEM) results
DHTDEM surveys were completed in selected drill holes at the Prieska Deposit to assess whether there are any
off-hole conductors, indicating any extensions to the mineralisation (refer ASX release 16 January 2019) (Figure
3).

Unfortunately, many of the target areas were not suitable for testing due to the large number of metal steering
wedges inserted into the mother holes. Conductive plates detected in three of the holes surveyed for
characterisation correspond well to the depth and structural orientation of the intersected mineralisation (Figure
4), confirming that DHTDEM is an effective tool to locate off-hole mineralisation at the Prieska Deposit.

An off-hole conductor in the south-eastern most hole drilled by Orion, OCOD137_D2 which intersected 11.3m at
4.47% Zn and 3.70% Cu (refer ASX release 5 November 2018) confirms that the thick massive sulphide intersection
persists to the south and east (Figure 5) beyond the drilled area.

Figure 3: Plan of the Deep Sulphide Resource showing location of drill holes surveyed with DHTDEM and conductive plates indicated.

Figure 4: Cross section through drill hole OCOD123_D2 indicating three conductive plates corresponding to the structure of known massive
sulphide mineralisation intersected in this hole.

Figure 5: Isometric view of the south-eastern part of the Deep Sulphide Resource (green) showing an off-hole conductive plate (brown) in hole
OCOD137_D2, indicating the continuation of the massive sulphide mineralisation along strike to the south and east.


Errol Smart
Managing Director and CEO

25 February 2019


ENQUIRIES

 Investors                              Media                                                                      JSE Sponsor
 Errol Smart – Managing                 Nicholas Read                               Barnaby Hayward                Rick Irving
 Director & CEO
 Denis Waddell – Chairman               Read Corporate, Australia                   Tavistock, UK                  Merchantec Capital
 T: +61 (0) 3 8080 7170                 T: +61 (0) 419 929 046                      T: +44 (0) 787 955 1355        T: +27 (0) 11 325 6363
 E: info@orionminerals.com.au           E: nicholas@readcorporate.com.au            E: orion@tavistock.co.uk       E: rick@merchantec.co.za
 Suite 617, 530 Little Collins Street
 Melbourne, VIC, 3000

Competent Person’s Statement

The information in this report that relates to Orion’s Exploration Results at the Prieska Near-Mine Project complies with the 2012
Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) and
has been compiled and assessed under the supervision of Mr Errol Smart, Orion Minerals Managing Director. Mr Smart
(PrSciNat) is registered with the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professionals, a Recognised Overseas Professional
Organisation (ROPO) for JORC purposes and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type
of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012
Edition of the JORC Code. Mr Smart consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information
in the form and context in which it appears. The Exploration Results are based on standard industry practises for geophysical
methods including quality control measures as detailed in Appendix 1.

Disclaimer

This release may include forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements may include, among other things,
statements regarding targets, estimates and assumptions in respect of metal production and prices, operating costs and
results, capital expenditures, mineral reserves and mineral resources and anticipated grades and recovery rates, and are or
may be based on assumptions and estimates related to future technical, economic, market, political, social and other
conditions. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future
events. Forward-looking statements inherently involve subjective judgement and analysis and are necessarily subject to risks,
uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Orion. Actual results and developments may vary
materially from those expressed in this release. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on such forward-looking statements. Orion makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking
statements made in this release to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release. All information in respect of
Exploration Results and other technical information should be read in conjunction with Competent Person Statements in this
release (where applicable). To the maximum extent permitted by law, Orion and any of its related bodies corporate and
affiliates and their officers, employees, agents, associates and advisers:
•      disclaim any obligations or undertaking to release any updates or revisions to the information to reflect any change in
       expectations or assumptions;
•      do not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the
       information in this release, or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-looking statement or any event or results expressed
       or implied in any forward-looking statement; and
•      disclaim all responsibility and liability for these forward-looking statements (including, without limitation, liability for
       negligence).


                                                                                                                                                
Appendix 1: The following tables are provided in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) requirements for the reporting of geophysical Exploration Results
for the Prieska and Near-Mine Projects.

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria                 JORC Code explanation                                                            Commentary

Sampling techniques      •   Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or          •   Not applicable to this report.
                             specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate
                             to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes,
                             or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be
                             taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
                         •   Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity
                             and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
                             used.
                         •   Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the
                             Public Report.
                         •   In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be
                             relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1
                             m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge
                             for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such
                             as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
                             Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules)
                             may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling techniques      •   Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air     •   Not applicable to this report.
                             blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple
                             or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
                             type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
Drill sample recovery    •   Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries            •   Not applicable to this report.
                             and results assessed.
                         •   Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
                             representative nature of the samples.
                         •   Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade
                             and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
                             loss/gain of fine/coarse material.


                                                                                                                                    
Criteria                JORC Code explanation                                                         Commentary

Logging                 •   Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and                  •   Not applicable to this report.
                            geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
                            Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
                        •   Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
                            costean, channel, etc.) photography.
                        •   The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling            •   If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core        •   Not applicable to this report.
techniques and              taken.
sample preparation      •   If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and
                            whether sampled wet or dry.
                        •   For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the
                            sample preparation technique.
                        •   Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
                            maximise representivity of samples.
                        •   Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-
                            situ material collected, including for instance results for field
                            duplicate/second-half sampling.
                        •   Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material
                            being sampled.
Quality of assay data   •   The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and               Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey
and laboratory tests        laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered
                                                                                                      •   The survey was flown with the SkyTEM 312 HP system. This high-power
                            partial or total.
                                                                                                          system, with a peak moment up to 1,000,000 NIA, is optimised to provide
                        •   For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc.,
                                                                                                          an exceptional depth of investigation, due to the high moment mode
                            the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument
                                                                                                          with high current and low base frequency of 12.5 Hz.
                            make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
                            derivation, etc.                                                          •   A total of 146.78km2 was covered by the SkyTEMTM survey.
                        •   Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,     •   Flight line spacing was 200m with 2000m spaced tie lines.
                            duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable            •   Terrain clearance of transmitter was 30m – 50m.
                            levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been            Down-hole Time Domain Electromagnetis Survey (DHTDEM)
                            established.
                                                                                                      •   DHTDEM surveys were carried out using a 3 component Digi-Atlantis
                                                                                                          probe and ultra high-power transmitter.
                                                                                                      •   A single loop with approximately 6000m circumference was used for the
                                                                                                          four holes surveyed. Continuous measurements were taken as the probe
                                                                                                          travelled into the hole and out again.
Verification of         •   The verification of significant intersections by either independent or    Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey
sampling and                alternative company personnel.
                                                                                                      •    Data collected was reviewed and qualtity control done daily on site by
assaying                •   The use of twinned holes.
                                                                                                           a consulting geophysicist.
                        •   Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
                                                                                                      •    Processing of the EM and magnetic data was done by SkyTEMTM.
                            verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

                                                                                                                                                                     
Criteria                  JORC Code explanation                                                          Commentary

                          •   Discuss any adjustment to assay data.                                      Down-hole Time Domain Electromagnetis Survey (DHTDEM)
                                                                                                         • Data was collected on site and validated by a geophysical technician
                                                                                                           daily.
                                                                                                         • Data (raw and processed) was sent to a consultant geophysicist for
                                                                                                           review and quality control.
Location of data points   •   Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and     Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey
                              down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used
                                                                                                         • GPS base stations were placed at a location of maximum possible view
                              in Mineral Resource estimation.
                                                                                                           to satellites and away from metallic objects that could influence the GPS
                          •   Specification of the grid system used.
                                                                                                           antenna.
                          •   Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
                                                                                                         Down-hole Time Domain Electromagnetis Survey (DHTDEM)
                                                                                                         • Downhole survey data using a North-Seeking Gyro instrument was used
                                                                                                           for the intertretation of the DHTDEM results.
Data spacing and          •   Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.                         •   Not applicable to this report.
distribution              •   Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the
                              degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
                              Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications
                              applied.
                          •   Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in    •   Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of          •   Not applicable to this report.
relation to geological        possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering
structure                     the deposit type.
                          •   If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
                              of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
                              sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security           •   The measures taken to ensure sample security.                              •   Not applicable to this report.

Audits or reviews         •   The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.      •   No review conducted.

                                                                                                                                                                        
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria                 JORC Code explanation                                                               Commentary

Mineral tenement and     •   Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including                   •   The Prospecting Rights are held by Repli Trading No 27 (Pty) Ltd,
land tenure status           agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,            Vardocube (Pty) Ltd and Bartotrax (Pty) Ltd, each of which are
                             partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,       subsidiaries of Orion.
                             wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
                         •   The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any
                             known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by      •   Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.                   •   Anglovaal conducted an airborne EM survey in 1969 followed up by
other parties                                                                                                    ground magnetic and EM surveys and geological mapping and a
                                                                                                                 second AEM survey in 1982.
                                                                                                             •   Newmont and Anglovaal undertook scout drilling on the northern area
                                                                                                                 in the 1970s and 1980s.
Geology                  •   Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.                   •   Mineralisation of Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) type and
                                                                                                                 possibly Magmatic hosted Cu-Ni type is situated in the southernmost
                                                                                                                 exposures of the north-northwest trending Kakamas Terrain, which forms
                                                                                                                 part of the Mid-Proterozoic Namaqualand Metamorphic Complex.
                                                                                                             •   The mineralisation is hosted by the Copperton Formation of the
                                                                                                                 Areachap Group which hosts several VMS (Prieska, Areachap, Boksputs,
                                                                                                                 Kantien Pan, Kielder and Annex deposit) and Magmatic hosted Cu-Ni
                                                                                                                 deposits (Jacomynspan and Rok Optel).
Drill hole Information   •   A summary of all information material to the understanding of the               •   Not applicable to this report.
                             exploration results including a tabulation of the following information
                             for all Material drill holes:
                             o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
                             o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in
                                  metres) of the drill hole collar
                             o dip and azimuth of the hole
                             o down hole length and interception depth
                             o hole length.
                         •   If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
                             information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
                             understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
                             explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation         •   In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,               •   Not applicable to this report.
methods                      maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high
                             grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.


                                                                                                                                                                             
Criteria                JORC Code explanation                                                            Commentary

                        •   Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade
                            results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for
                            such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of
                            such aggregations should be shown in detail.
                        •   The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
                            should be clearly stated.
Relationship between    •   These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of           •   Not applicable to this report.
mineralisation widths       Exploration Results.
and intercept lengths   •   If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle
                            is known, its nature should be reported.
                        •   If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
                            should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true
                            width not known’).
Diagrams                •   Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of               •   Appropriate diagrams (plans and section) are shown in Figures 1 to 4 of
                            intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being                the report.
                            reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill
                            hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting      •   Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not              •   Not applicable to this report.
                            practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
                            and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
                            Exploration Results.
Other substantive       •  Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported        •   Not applicable to this report.
exploration data           including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
                           survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and
                           method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
                           groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential
                           deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work            • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral           • Further ground geophysical surveys and follow-up drilling are planned
                          extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).                over the AEM anomalies.
                        • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including      • Drill testing of the DHTDEM conductive plate is planned.
                          the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
                          this information is not commercially sensitive.




                                                                                                                                                                       

Date: 25/02/2019 07:34:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story