AYO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LIMITED - AYO Further Response to Article in BusinessDay

AYO Further Response to Article in BusinessDay

AYO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LIMITED
(Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
Registration number: 1996/014461/06
JSE share code: AYO
ISIN: ZAE000252441
("AYO" or "the Company")

AYO Further Response to Article in Business Day

Shareholders are referred to the article (“Article”) published in the
Business Day on 26 February 2019 referring to a compliance notice (“Notice”)
issued by the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (“CIPC”)
requiring that the Public Investment Corporation (“PIC”) recoup its
investment in AYO.

AYO would like to reiterate to shareholders that it believes the grounds for
such recoupment have no merit and are baseless for the following reasons:

1. The process followed by CIPC was procedurally incorrect

   CIPC falls within the ambit of the Promotion of Administrative Justice
   Act, 2000 (Act No. 3 of 2000) which gives effect to the right
   to administrative justice. Therefore, both the PIC and AYO should have
   been consulted and had sight of the Notice.

   It is concerning therefore that a newspaper was informed of the Notice
   prior to both parties concerned having at least, at the very minimum,
   received a copy of such compliance notice. AYO believes that such action
   on the part of CIPC to be highly regrettable, if not irresponsible.

   AYO further believes that CIPC, by failing to inform and provide it with
   a copy of the Notice to PIC, has acted contrary to the provisions of the
   Promotion of Administrative Justice Act.

   AYO notes that the decision by CIPC is unprecedented and would like to
   categorically state that it did not, and has not, received a copy of the
   Notice.

2. CIPC has based its decision on incorrect information

   Based solely on the information contained in the Article, it would appear
   CIPC has reached a conclusion to issue the Notice based on incorrect
   information.

   It is stated in the Article that, according to the records of CIPC, AYO
   has never generated turnover of more than R12 million.

   Shareholders are referred to the audited financial statements of AYO for
   the 12 months ended 31 August 2018 and are advised that AYO generated
   revenue in excess of R638 million for such financial year.

   It still needs to be determined why CIPC believes AYO’s revenue to have
   never exceeded R12 million, but needless to say, this is incorrect.

   CIPC is confusing company turnover with Group consolidated revenue and
   profitability.

3. CIPC determination of the value of AYO

   The Article refers to CIPC stating that the key issue was the high
   valuation the PIC placed on AYO’s shares at listing and that this did not
   “square” with its own information which shows a company with revenue
   never exceeding R12 million.

   As disclosed above, besides CIPC having incorrect information about AYO,
   it seems they have undertaken a valuation of AYO to determine if the
   investment by the PIC was sound or not.

   AYO questions whether the CIPC mandate allows for it to undertake a
   valuation, compare it to the valuation of another company (in this case
   the PIC) and based on the discrepancy between such valuations, issue a
   compliance notice.

   For the record, AYO stands by its valuation, is implementing its strategy
   in line with its pre-listing statement and questions the jurisdiction
   competence of CIPC to make determinations on valuations.


4. AYO was never contacted to provide input

   AYO was not consulted at any time prior to the issuance of the Notice,
   meaning the decision by CIPC was, in addition to being based on incorrect
   information, potentially biased and influenced by a disinformation
   campaign by media houses and individual journalists.


AYO re-asserts that the investment the PIC made into the holding group during
the listing, remains sound. AYO has made significant strides forward with
an established and solid base, and a number of sound acquisitions and
investments.


AYO regrets CIPC’s action and advise that it is ready to engage with CIPC on
the matter.


Cape Town
26 February 2019

Sponsor
Vunani Corporate Finance

Date: 26/02/2019 02:12:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.